This episode of “Disorder in the Court,”
comes to us from the Land Down Under, in which
we learn that incest and pedophilia are no longer
unacceptable forms of sexual expression.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Australian Judge Suggests Incest, Pedophilia Are Next ‘Civil Rights ~
Sydney, Australia District Court Judge Garry Neilson…
…had the audacity to suggest that some may no longer see sexual contact between adults and children as “unnatural” or “taboo,” according to a report in the Sydney Morning Herald. He went on to remind that gay sex was not acceptable—and actually criminal—in the 1950s and 1960s but many tolerate it today.
Neilson made the remarks against the backdrop of a 58-year-old man who was charged with raping his pre-pubescent sister decades ago. The man, known as MRM in the legal case, pled out to incest instead of rape.
“A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner,” Neilson said, noting that the “only reason” incest is still a criminal act is because of the high risk of genetic defects. But he has a solution for that, too: “ready access to abortion.”
Judge Neilson isn’t saying anything new here. Western civilization’s moral values have been decaying for decades. He’s just putting the court’s official sanction on the deviancy. And sure, why not. Aren’t we all just “born that way” – whatever “that” is?
But on the other hand – to borrow a favorite intimidation phrase from the lefties – who is this judge “to judge?”
In response to Neilson’s proclamations…
Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth, a national organization devoted to exposing and countering the homosexual activist agenda, may have said it best: “The slippery slope of sexual perversion and sin continues to yield stunning departures from healthy, Judeo-Christian morality.”
Related:
Cultural Decline & the “Gaga Factor”
What if “the one you love” is “man’s best friend?”