In this week’s episode of “Disorder in the Court,”
we meet a California judge who has lost his grasp on reality and essentially
declared that there’s no difference between homosexual and heterosexual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rod Dreher at American Conservative reports on a Title IX case at Pepperdine University involving two women who allege that the school…
“discriminated against and harassed them” because of their perceived sexual orientation.
Here’s an excerpt of Pregerson’s ruling (which at this point only allows the case to proceed to trial) ~
Simply put, the line between sex discrimination and sexual orientation discrimination is “difficult to draw” because that line does not exist, save as a lingering and faulty judicial construct. …
In sexual orientation discrimination cases, focusing on the actions or appearance of the alleged victim of discrimination rather than the bias of the alleged perpetrator asks the wrong question and compounds the harm. A plaintiff’s “actual” sexual orientation is irrelevant to a Title IX or Title VII claim because it is the biased mind of the alleged discriminator that is the focus of the analysis. This is especially true given that sexuality cannot be defined on a homosexual or heterosexual basis; it exists on a continuum.
In other words, there are no such things as homosexuality or heterosexuality. Apparently those are just archaic distinctions fabricated in a less-enlightened time. And if you disagree – well, that’s just your “biased mind” talking.
This gender-bending is leading to cultural insanity 😯
(And we thought the Three Stooges were nuts!)
